Nikon Model
post
-
▼
2010
(38)
-
►
February
(14)
- Nikon 18-55mm f/3.5
- Nikon D3000-D5000 DSLR Starter Kit
- Nikon D300 (Body Only) Price
- Nikon D300s 12MP (Body Only) review
- Nikon Backpack for DSLR
- Review Nikon D300s DSLR Digital Camera
- nikon D300 Grip review
- Nikon EN-EL3e Rechargeable Li-Ion Battery for D200...
- Nikon D300 review
- Nikon D300s review
- Nikon D5000 12.3 MP review
- Nikon D5000 12.3 MP DX Digital SLR Camera review
- Nikon D60 10.2MP with 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S revi...
- Nikon D60 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera review
-
►
January
(15)
- Nikon D3000 Digital Field Guide (Paperback)
- Nikon D3000 10.2MP Digital SLR Camera
- Nikon Gadget Bag
- Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G
- Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF-S
- Nikon D700 12.1MP
- Nikon Lens Hood
- Filter Kit
- Nikon SB-600 Speedlight Flash
- Flash for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
- Tiffen 58mm UV Protection Filter
- Nikon D5000 Review
- LCD Timer Vertical Battery Grip
- D90 my review
- Nikon D90 Review
-
►
February
(14)
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 SLD DG Macro Lens with built in motor for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras

Technical Details
- 14 Elements in 10 Groups Lens Construction
- 34.3 to 8.2 degrees angle of view
- F22 Minimum Aperture
- 59.1 (150cm) / 37.4 (95cm) Macro Mode Minimum Focusing Distance
- 1 - 4.1 / 1 - 2 Macro Mode Maximum Magnification

I hesitated buying this lens for my Nikon D40X - probably looked at this property six or seven times before they buy. Honestly I was worried about how it is inexpensive. Now, I'm probably very average amateur photographer in that the majority of my pictures are things of the family: children's sports events, holidays, birthdays, etc.. But this does not mean I'm willing to compromise on quality to save a little money, and I know that the Nikon 55-200 is an objective quality.
But I bought based on the review Michael Del Priore (his was the only critical at the time) - I thought at that price (especially compared with the Nikon 55-200), why not give it a shot, and I 'm glad I did.
This is an excellent goal. The autofocus motor is quick and does not chew the battery (I was concerned about that, but I shot about 170 images on my son's games two Saturdays ago and do not use more energy than Nikon 35-70 lens supplied with the unit). Like "cinderoo" I have not had any problems to speak of stabilization or even behind the shutter, while following 12 years old boys run along a field. Perhaps more than one problem with macro photography, but I guess most of the photograph (albeit limited) macro that I'd probably be using a tripod anyway.
Now nobody take me for a professional photographer, but I can tell you that when I shoot pictures with my D40X and the Sigma on my 24 "iMac and the display in full screen, they are * all * I was looking for when I decided to move to an SLR.
But I bought based on the review Michael Del Priore (his was the only critical at the time) - I thought at that price (especially compared with the Nikon 55-200), why not give it a shot, and I 'm glad I did.
This is an excellent goal. The autofocus motor is quick and does not chew the battery (I was concerned about that, but I shot about 170 images on my son's games two Saturdays ago and do not use more energy than Nikon 35-70 lens supplied with the unit). Like "cinderoo" I have not had any problems to speak of stabilization or even behind the shutter, while following 12 years old boys run along a field. Perhaps more than one problem with macro photography, but I guess most of the photograph (albeit limited) macro that I'd probably be using a tripod anyway.
Now nobody take me for a professional photographer, but I can tell you that when I shoot pictures with my D40X and the Sigma on my 24 "iMac and the display in full screen, they are * all * I was looking for when I decided to move to an SLR.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment